The information you provided suggests a conflict between Delhi Minister Atishi and the Enforcement Directorate (ED) over allegations of the deletion of audio recordings from CCTV footage during interrogations in a liquor policy case.
The ED has strongly denied these allegations, calling them false, baseless, and malicious. According to the ED, all statements of accused individuals were recorded under CCTV surveillance, and the recordings were provided to the accused as well as the trial court.
What ED says in a press conference
Also Read: wellhealth how to build muscle tag
The ED further clarified that its CCTV system records only video and not audio, and no audio recordings were deleted by ED officers. The agency accused leaders of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) of making baseless allegations to discredit evidence against their alleged misdeeds.
ED takes legal action against Atishi.
In response to Atishi’s allegations, the ED has stated that it may take severe legal action against her for making false accusations. The ED asserts that interrogations were conducted with audio-video recording, challenging Atishi’s claims of deleted audio recordings.
Why was legal action taken against Atishi?
Atishi, on the other hand, accuses the ED of deleting audio recordings during interrogations and questions the agency’s transparency. She demands that the ED provide audio and video recordings in court and raises concerns about the discrepancy between the statements submitted by the ED and what transpired during interrogations.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the situation involves a conflict of claims between Atishi and the ED, with Atishi alleging deletion of audio recordings and the ED vehemently denying these accusations. Legal action may be taken against Atishi for making what the ED considers false and malicious statements. The case appears to revolve around the handling of evidence and the transparency of the ED’s investigative procedures.
Next Read: Wellhealth Ayurvedic Health Tips