Imran Khan was looking for donations from foreign Pakistan to overthrow a new government

2 min read

Islamabad: Overthrowing Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan on Friday begged Pakistani citizens abroad to donate money to the Pakistani Tehreek-e-Casaf Party (PTI) to bring down the government “supported by foreigners” Shohbaz Sharif.

Ironically, Khan has asked Pakistani abroad to be donated to a party that blames America because of overthrowing his government in Pakistan.

In his video message on Twitter, he told the Overseas Pakistan about the Nomanzoor.com website that collected donations from them to bring down the Shehbaz Sharif government and held new elections.

He called the “Haqiqi-Azadi” campaign and said that “the corrupt government” was forced in 22 Pakistani tror populations.

Khan said that it was the right of Pakistani residents to decide who would rule their country – both the PTI Party or “corrupt Sharif Family” which had been imprisoned for three years and who fought against allegations of corruption.

Former Pakistani Prime Minister also spooned the US for conspiracy with Shehbaz Sharif whose government was applied to Pakistists through “foreign conspiracies.”

Khan alleged that with the help of the US, a corrupt government had surpassed Pakistan and therefore he wanted the country to hold new elections where the residents of Pakasistan could decide their future.

A few days before the vote against his government, former Prime Minister Imran Khan alleged that the resolution of him was part of the “foreign conspiracy” hatching in the US, producing a “threat letter” alleged from the Pakistani Embassy in the US. We are proof.

According to the “letter of threat” which was a diplomatic cable received from the Pakistani Ambassador to the US Asad Majeed, Assistant Secretary of the United States for South Asian and Central Affairs Donald Lu has warned the Ambassador of Pakistan that the continuation of Imran Khan will have a consequence of bilateral relations. The US was said to be annoyed with Imran for “Independent Foreign Policy” and Moscow’s visit.